Indeema Software vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Very (4.2/5) edges ahead of Indeema Software (4.1/5) overall. Very is the better choice for distributed-delivery IoT programs needing firmware plus data and ML. Indeema Software is the stronger option for mid-size IoT programs needing firmware plus mobile and cloud. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Indeema Software vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland (also Lviv, Ukraine and Wilmington, Delaware, USA) | Bozeman, Montana, USA (fully distributed team) |
| Team size | 100–249 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Dedicated IoT and IIoT division spanning firmware through mobile app and cloud infrastructure delivery | Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions |
| Pricing model | Fixed project and dedicated team engagements | IoT product development engagements from concept through deployment |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Cloud infrastructure, Mobile SDKs | Embedded C/C++, IoT connectivity stacks, Machine learning data pipelines |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart devices | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
Indeema Software vs Very: overview
Indeema Software
Indeema Software was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Wrocław, Poland, with additional teams in Lviv, Ukraine, and Wilmington, Delaware; the company reports 100 to 249 employees. A dedicated IoT and IIoT division covers firmware, mobile applications, and cloud infrastructure as one delivery unit, aimed at mid-size IoT programs that need more than firmware alone. The three-country delivery model gives it working-hour overlap with both European and US clients, though firmware is one part of a broader IoT services portfolio rather than the company's sole practice.
Very
Very, formerly known by a different name, was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Bozeman, Montana, operating as a fully distributed team of 51 to 200 people working from numerous countries rather than from central offices. The firm builds connected ecosystems spanning IoT hardware, firmware, and software infrastructure, plus interface design and machine-learning-driven data solutions built on top of device data. Very has appeared on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing private US companies multiple times, a verifiable third-party growth signal distinct from marketing claims.
Services and capabilities: Indeema Software vs Very
| Capability | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✗ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Framework / platform | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| RISC-V | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Criterion | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Dimension | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart devices | Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure |
| Best use cases | Mid-size IoT product needing firmware, mobile app, and cloud infrastructure from one vendor, AI-enabled IoT device requiring both embedded and cloud-side machine learning components | IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis, Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Indeema Software vs Very: pros and cons
| Indeema Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Three-location delivery model across Poland, Ukraine, and the US overlaps with both European and US working hours |
| + | Covers firmware, mobile, and cloud infrastructure under one IoT and IIoT division |
| + | Team size of 100 to 249 gives more bench depth than the smallest boutiques on this list |
| - | Firmware is one part of a broader IoT services portfolio rather than the company's sole focus |
| - | Founded in 2014, a shorter track record than the decades-old firms on this list |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal |
| + | Fully distributed team structure can draw specialist talent regardless of location |
| + | Combines firmware delivery with data solutions and machine learning on top of device telemetry |
| - | Fully distributed structure means no central office for in-person collaboration during an engagement |
| - | Montana headquarters is a smaller regional base than most firms' US locations on this list |
Who should choose Indeema Software?
A typical fit: mid-size IoT product needing firmware, mobile app, and cloud infrastructure from one vendor.
Dedicated IoT and IIoT division spanning firmware through mobile app and cloud infrastructure delivery. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart devices.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis.
Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT, Smart infrastructure.
Decision matrix: Indeema Software vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Indeema Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Indeema Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Indeema Software (Not published) vs Very (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Indeema Software |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Indeema Software vs Very
| Use case | Indeema Software fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-size IoT product needing firmware, mobile app, and cloud infrastructure from one vendor | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
| AI-enabled IoT device requiring both embedded and cloud-side machine learning components | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
| IoT program needing firmware paired with machine-learning-driven data analysis | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Smart infrastructure product requiring both device firmware and interface design | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Indeema Software vs Very
Very (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions.
Indeema Software (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need AI-enabled IoT device requiring both embedded and cloud-side machine learning components. If your situation matches that, Indeema Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Indeema Software vs Very FAQ
Is Indeema Software better than Very?
Very (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Indeema Software's strongest advantage: three-location delivery model across Poland, Ukraine, and the US overlaps with both European and US working hours. Very's strongest advantage: repeat appearances on the Inc. 5000 list provide a verifiable third-party growth signal.
How do Indeema Software and Very differ in pricing?
Indeema Software uses fixed project and dedicated team engagements pricing. Very uses iot product development engagements from concept through deployment pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Indeema Software or Very?
Indeema Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Indeema Software and Very?
Indeema Software's primary differentiator is: dedicated IoT and IIoT division spanning firmware through mobile app and cloud infrastructure delivery. Very's primary differentiator is: fully distributed IoT team combining firmware delivery with machine-learning-driven data solutions. They also differ in team size (100–249 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT vs Industrial IoT, Consumer IoT).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.