Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of SaM Solutions (4.0/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RTOS firmware needing secure boot and direct chip-vendor partnerships. SaM Solutions is the stronger option for enterprises wanting an established IT generalist with embedded capability. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | SaM Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1993 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Gilching, Germany |
| Team size | 200+ | 501–1,000 |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing | Three-decade-old IT services firm with an embedded and IoT practice inside a much broader software portfolio |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or team extension/staff augmentation | Fixed project, staff augmentation, and managed services |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | Embedded C/C++, IoT platforms, Enterprise integration tooling |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Manufacturing, Automotive, Enterprise IT |
Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team builds RTOS and bare-metal firmware on FreeRTOS, Zephyr, and Azure RTOS, alongside secure boot, OTA update pipelines, and MISRA-aware testing for regulated clients. It holds direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip as primary semiconductor partners, plus an in-house lab with oscilloscopes and hardware-in-the-loop testing for board bring-up. Public case studies include a KONVOI truck security firmware audit and a Caltech medical device port to STM32, and the company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications with full IP transfer to the client on delivery.
SaM Solutions
SaM Solutions was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Gilching, Germany, with a workforce reported between 501 and 1,000 employees serving clients across Europe and the United States. Embedded and IoT engineering sits as one practice area within a broader IT services portfolio that also covers enterprise software, QA, and data engineering, so the firm suits a client that wants an established generalist with embedded capability rather than a specialist firmware boutique. Its scale and three-decade history give it more organizational stability than most firms on this list, at the cost of the deep firmware specialization boutiques offer.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | SaM Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bare-metal & driver development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot / OTA firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| MCU & platform migration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Connectivity & IoT protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Functional safety / MISRA compliance | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded AI / on-device inference | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | SaM Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| ARM Cortex-M | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Secure OTA | N/A | N/A |
| PCB | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| RISC-V | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | SaM Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Staff augmentation, Managed services |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | SaM Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics | Manufacturing, Automotive, Enterprise IT |
| Best use cases | Security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline, Secure OTA update pipeline for a fleet of connected industrial devices | Enterprise client wanting a single established vendor for both firmware and broader IT needs, Large-scale industrial IoT program needing significant staff augmentation capacity |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip back up semiconductor-level claims instead of a generic all-chips pitch |
| + | In-house lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and HIL testing capability covers board bring-up work most pure-firmware vendors outsource |
| + | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and ISO 13485 certifications plus MISRA-aware testing suit regulated industrial and medical firmware |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named case studies span automotive security auditing, medical device porting, and industrial telemetry rather than one vertical |
| - | Does not manufacture finished devices or handle mass production in-house |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf; the client or a third party owns that process |
| - | Minimum engagement size is not published, so budget fit requires a direct conversation |
| SaM Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | More than three decades of operating history since 1993 gives strong organizational stability |
| + | Large team of 501 to 1,000 supports bigger, multi-workstream enterprise programs |
| + | Broader IT services portfolio can absorb adjacent work like enterprise integration alongside firmware |
| - | Embedded and IoT firmware is a smaller practice inside a much larger generalist IT business |
| - | Less firmware-specific specialization than the boutique firms ranked above it on this list |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline.
Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose SaM Solutions?
A typical fit: enterprise client wanting a single established vendor for both firmware and broader IT needs.
Three-decade-old IT services firm with an embedded and IoT practice inside a much broader software portfolio. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Automotive, Enterprise IT.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | SaM Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs SaM Solutions (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | SaM Solutions fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security audit of an existing firmware codebase ahead of a compliance deadline | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Secure OTA update pipeline for a fleet of connected industrial devices | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Enterprise client wanting a single established vendor for both firmware and broader IT needs | Limited | Strong | SaM Solutions |
| Large-scale industrial IoT program needing significant staff augmentation capacity | Limited | Strong | SaM Solutions |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | SaM Solutions |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing.
SaM Solutions (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale industrial IoT program needing significant staff augmentation capacity. If your situation matches that, SaM Solutions is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs SaM Solutions FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than SaM Solutions?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: direct partnerships with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip back up semiconductor-level claims instead of a generic all-chips pitch. SaM Solutions's strongest advantage: more than three decades of operating history since 1993 gives strong organizational stability.
How do Lemberg Solutions and SaM Solutions differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or team extension/staff augmentation pricing. SaM Solutions uses fixed project, staff augmentation, and managed services pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or SaM Solutions?
SaM Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and SaM Solutions?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partnerships paired with an in-house hardware lab for board bring-up and HIL testing. SaM Solutions's primary differentiator is: three-decade-old IT services firm with an embedded and IoT practice inside a much broader software portfolio. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 501–1,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA/IEC 62304), Energy (battery management, EV charging) vs Manufacturing, Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.